Thumbs up if agree or what are your suggestions?
Thanks @poc2go.
Just to add that a reasonable way to action this idea would be to add a note to tiddlywiki.com/dev and also to add a test which parses text that includes the strings {%
and %}
, and verifies that a plain text node is returned.
I did change the title of this thread, since I think “escape syntax” is occupied by “regexp string manipulation” functions. So it is a bit confusing.
IMO {% text %}
should just be guaranteed, to not be used by future TW versions, since the Node-Red TW Server needs it.
So it also should not be used by other 3rd party plugins, in a different way than the Node-Red TW server uses it. Because this will cause compatibility problems.
If we officially announce that
-
{% node red %}
is reserved for a 3rd party project and it will never be used by TW -
we should also announce that
(= formula =)
is reserved, because it is used by the formula-pluign,- which we IMO should adopt as a core plugin.
just some thoughts.
Love the formula plugin.
If it worked with the graphing plugin and possibly some of mathcell that would make for a very nice maths edition!
Back on topic, yes, reserve those {% (=