Right. IMO, simple point, updating for changes in the easiest way possible is very much on target. Hats off to you for caring!
TT
Hi Freddy,
great to see you making progress. My version is a little asleep, and I told Saq to recommend only yours.
I am definitely in favor of a wikitext-solution.
best wishes Jan
1 Like
Please note that there is now a dedicated thread related to Streams Fusion discussion:
1 Like
@saqimtiaz I think you should add back the double click editor to exit feature as a configurable option. I think it would be better to have that feature than not have it. One thing which went against double click editor to exit was that it may conflict with text selection using double click, but text selection can be done by Drag selection or keyboard shortcuts also. Also the number of times we may need double click to exit editing will be far more than number of times we may need double click to select text .
Swipe to indent/unindent could also be brought back to the plug in with visual feedback. I had shared my suggestion in github sometime back. If the swipe is of sufficient distance, indent or unindent is triggered. If the swipe is shorter, just like in WhatsApp for iOS , show options like context menu, indent/unindent etc. and select which ever is needed.
I am afraid this will not be introduced. There were several usability concerns with it and having extra configurable options incurs an overhead in terms of code maintenance and performance.
I will consider this if I find the time and motivation to work on new features for Streams, though my focus is unlikely to be on mobile UX.
2 Likes
Any possibility of monaco editor support for streams in the future
If support for any more editors is to be added, we would need to drop the features that involve knowing where the caret is in the editor.
For example:
- backspace at the beginning of a node to merge with the previous node
- splitting a node at the caret on enter, etc
None of the editors provide the necessary information for these features to work, and adding these features to them manually and maintaining that isn’t sustainable. Truth be told, I regret adding support for codemirror. It has made the codebase more brittle and harder to maintain.
2 Likes
I have moved speculative discussion on new ideas that I am exploring to a separate post, as the audience for that might be smaller than those interested in support and news of more concrete development:
@saqimtiaz Is Streams plugin stable now? I’m planning creating an alternative layout to write down Principles that I’m agree to.
Principles in that book is organized in tree structure, and each could be linked from diary, and revisit by tidme plugin, so Streams plugin is suitable for it.
@linonetwo while there has not been active development for a while, the plugin itself is entirely stable and should be reliable for daily usage. I am committed to maintaining it with regards to bug fixes and compatibility with core changes.
3 Likes
Can confirm, I use the streams plugin for nearly all my text entry and have for years now – I’ve found it incredibly versatile, resilient, and reliable.
2 Likes
As your name suggests 
Could you split the streams plugin to a library plugin that provides a outline widget, and a streams plugin same as current one for end user?
So plugin authors like me can embed the outline in our plugins, without showing nodes like this for people only install my plugin
I know $:/config/sq/streams/stream-enable-filter can be change from [!is[shadow]] to include and only include my layout plugins’s internal shadow tiddler, but this may cause problem on other users (not showing outline on my anternative layout, or not showing outline on every tiddler).
I already extract auto-complete-box plugin from command palette plugin, as an example Command palette plugin v1.0 , powerful context search bar, search under filter, etc - #47 by linonetwo . Simillarly, you could split the reuseable core feature to a new plugin, and keep things that works out-of-box (like $:/plugins/sq/streams/stream-view-template) in current plugin.
Anyway, I will use it for now, assuming my users don’t user streams plugin directly. My config on $:/config/sq/streams/new-node-title and $:/tags/streams/root-buttons will also affect them globally. I hope all config can be passed-in using widget or macro parameters too.
I can’t wait, so I do it here Streams outliner, now works as a procedure, use it as a library in your plugin , feel free to request a PR.
2 Likes
@linonetwo interesting use case! I will keep this in mind when I get the chance for a rewrite. Breaking out parts of plugins into separate plugins is appealing and something In have considered in the past, but the appeal as a developer needs to be balanced with the end user experience. Most TiddlyWiki users do not install plugins via plugin libraries from what I can tell, so dependencies are potentially problematic.
1 Like
I have noticed that hitting Alt-Up to demote the first node in a list does nothing. If this isn’t a problem of my setup (I can only use TiddlyWiki on mobile), consider what follows below a feature request. Making it possible to push the first node to the bottom of the list would make the management of nodes more flexible. Same for making it possible to push the last node to the top of the list by hitting Alt-Down.
An use case of this is using Streams as checklist manager. When marking the first item done, one usually wants items that are not done still at the top of the list, so quickly pushing the most recenly done item to the bottom of the list achieves that.
An evolution of this idea is to make it possible to push any given node in the list to the top or to the bottom, by hitting Alt-t / Alt-b for example. Unlike Alt-Up and Alt-Down, which are complementary and simply turn a list into a double linked list, Alt-t and Alt-b are more complex: pushing an item from the middle of the list to either the top or the bottom of it, completely changes the ordering, so having a one level undo (Alt-u) here could help to quick fix accidental typing mistakes.
PS: I don’t know if these suggestions fit the philosophy of Streams. My impression is that Streams is primarily advertised for fluid, distraction free, yet linear writing. My intention is to use it as outliner (tree-like structure) and having rich node management options is essential.
The general approach I take is to only add features that seem universal to Streams, and to allow for further customizations to help users adapt it to their workflows. These features that you desire can be added by configuring custom keyboard shortcuts for streams, see Streams — on TiddlyWiki 5.2.2