Comment #2 on the zoom="<n>" new Slider
I dunno how to successfully describe the good and the not so good on the new Zoom Slider without getting in an explanatory pickle.
I’ll try. But please ask if it is unclear.
Two points to start …
- Customizable zoom is great!
- All my comments are coming from the “fat-finger situation” of a modest screened Chromebook with no pen or keyboard.
My needs on zooming?
Based on tests so far, for my environment …
- For NORMAL use I’m finding that
".5" ".75" & "1"work to cover most all use cases
A button to toggle between those three might work better for me than a range slider?
- For SPECIAL use, for instance as an adjunctive to Visual Art analysis already possible at the UK National Gallery
Here a range slider could add to that site’s existing zoom feature. But in a fat-finger environment it would probably need to be long & look like this … ??
What am I saying?
-
For (my) normal use I need no more than 3 zoom levels and a slider in a “smaller screen fat-finger situation” seems over ui’d.
I’d prefer a toggle. Dunno! -
For my special interests in visual art a big slider could be useful.
I hope this is clear enough to convey enough UI sense!
TT






