Bob,
Someone else is going to give you better advice, Iâm sure. But if you need a quick, easy solution, Iâll tell you what Iâd do:
I would have a time stamp attached to each of the files (slaves and masters alike). The slaves might have identifiers but I would try to get away from having them with individualsâ names on them. The master would have â-Master
â somewhere in the file name: 202506-072220-202506-072219-ProjectTW-Master
. Note the two date stamps: the first being the update and the second being the âthreadâ or âversionâ (I donât mean the TW version; rather: YOUR teamâs TW version).
The slaves would have something like: 202506-072203-202506-072219-ProjectTW-25
(25 denoting the team member). You, if you are the leader, could have â1â for your own slave version.
Team members (slaves, including you) can upload your slave versions to the server or other storage. That would mean a lot of backups and versions. But you would know which ones are the later versions from the file names. They would never be overwritten. Just archived.
But to resolve this issue of having slave TWs having tiddlers that are not in the latest â-Masterâ TW, I would ask that all team members (including yourself) âdumpâ all the latest relevant tiddlers onto the file server as well (JSON files), which, in turn have their own "time stamps, -Master /-Slave, title". What youâll get is a tonne of tiddlers and TWs on the server. But when you update the â-Masterâ tiddler, youâll know which tiddler JSONs to pick from.
Everyone on the team would have access to the latest â-Master TWâ and could themselves compare whether their ârelevantâ tiddlers made it successfully to the â-Masterâ.
It is, in fact what I do personally, even though Iâm the only active âteamâ member. (Like everyone else here, I use multiple computers and devices. But unlike everyone else I DO NOT USE CLOUD or server storage.) The other member being my wife, who has little interest in TWing. 
Youâll soon get a genius coding /script solution and possibly a plugin solution thatâs way better than the one above. But, this is my two cents.