I do understand that post-apocalypse iframes got segregated and treated as suspicious characters. What is my point? It is a great shame we currently (as far as I can see) can’t embed iframes of target TW here, right, in the Discourse interface. IF we could it would likely rocket (:rocket: ) unders…

[image] Mark_S: The main page, yes. It’s too big. But what about subsets, when you want to point to a reference tiddler (e.g. static tiddler). As I wrote, it would be worth to explore, how we can add the right meta data, that https://tiddlywiki.com/static/all%2520Operator.html can create the …

[image] Mark_S: people are away from their home wifi most of the day. For example, their workplace may not allow personal access to the work wifi system. So they have to depend on their data, which is likely to be both slower and costlier Point taken. I do think it worth noting that the point…

[image] pmario: As I wrote, it would be worth to explore, how we can add the right meta data, that https://tiddlywiki.com/static/all%20Operator.html can create the “card like” view in Discourse. I think TT wants more than that. Nevertheless, apparently if we could add description tags, or wh…

[image] Mark_S: I think TT wants more than that. Right. I was / am interested in bridging the gap between talking about our thing and actually having it liveish. That said if any ordinary user could easily add a “card” such that, easily, it would turn up here it would be good! BUT how real…

[image] TiddlyTitch: That said if any ordinary user could easily add a “card” such that, easily, it would turn up here it would be good! A card to any arbitrary site, or a card to a static tiddler? The former, not so much, the latter maybe if you could convince Jeremy. I think it would be us…

[image] boris: Lack of this in single file tiddler is one of the reasons – from social sharing to SEO – that I can’t really recommend it. Right – not good for single file wikis. But TW’s parallel static website could have the appropriate OG headers embedded. Including, possibly, a url link to…

The recipes are just for parsing header / open graph / Twitter info. Single file TW / anchor tags don’t carry this info since it’s just a single HTML file. And yes, totally doable for statically published TWs. Much like generating feeds, open graph support by default for publishing would be an impo…

[image] Mark_S: Like a link to the all operator might look like: https://tiddlywiki.com/all%20Operator FYI: The above format works out of the box is static tiddlers have being published either as separate files, or automatically by a node implementation. I have long believed if static tiddl…

[image] TW_Tones: I have long believed if static tiddlers are published (individual or server generated) that all their links should not point to other static tiddlers but to the permalink within the wiki. Right. The more we simply connect to real TW the better IMO. Shirley, that is the poin…

The Many Clicks Problem to See Mother