My latest "most basic": an update sort of

Meta
1

Hi all. Meta-question: I’ve got the latest from a conversation I paused a few weeks ago. I posted yesterday, but as I browse here I’m guessing that it didn’t appear as “something new” for most readers?

When I try to link to that, or repeat it here, that shows up as an error. Makes sense, spam is bad. But how should I resurrect something I paused?

The topic – to see if I can refer from here: “A broad SSL recipe?”

2

Attempting to interpret what you mean, I’m thinking maybe you can’t find this article: A broad SSL recipe?

3

Yeah. It’s worth skipping most of that and going to the bottom.

Thanks.

4

Well, and: it wasn’t that I “couldn’t find” it. More like, “resurrect it”, and the ways I tried to do that were being caught as spam-ish errors. I did refer it, as you did, but when I tried to re-post any reference, that was seeming to trigger as an error.

Educate me? What’s the right way to link like that?

Thanks.

5

Just post something in it? This makes it bump up to the top in the list.

6

What does this mean? Did you just not do anything or something else?

Perhaps go to create a new post and check if you have an unposted draft.

Or try getting the “link” from the original thread and share that here.

7

“I paused a few weeks ago”: meaning, I left this conversation while I worked toward my goal and other areas.

I did post a reply to the originally referred message, but – correct me if I’m wrong – it seemed that my reply there didn’t appear in the “new” column on this site. Different systems handle things in different ways; forgive me if I misinterpreted what I found on this process.

8

…or, maybe: the “automatically flagged as spam” process hit what I’d just added. That seems (if I read the automatic messages properly) to be hitting more than one of my postings here. Why, I don’t know.

9

Your topic has been at the very top of my “Latest” overview, since you posed there. As Tony wrote, it was automatically resurrected as you did add a post there.

That’s a screenshot when I do use my account to access the Talk site

image
image1563×570 74.2 KB

10

The latest did go through that way, after I added that bit, after we had the back-and-forth here. It wasn’t the case to begin with.

11

Sorry for the inconvenience.

I did move this thread to the Meta category.

It seems you did add too many links in your posts. I did have a look at the “moderators” notifications after your posts here …

I did add “talk.tiddlywiki.org” to the exceptions-list. It wasn’t there yet. So links here and to tiddlywiki.com shouldn’t cause “spam” detection problems anymore. …

have fun!
mario

12

Just a guess: could it be from the links I added were those contained in the system notices I was referring to?

Any effect, good or bad, by the leading “>” in my own writeup? Obviously I’m new here, probably unaware of assumed practice.

Thanks.

13

May be. You may have used triple backticks to mark it as code area instead of a comment.

eg:

```
your code comes here
```