Sure, and I do use it all the time. But you often express a strong preference for using built-in wikitext solutions over custom JavaScript whenever possible. I have a similar preference for plain wikitext over HTML whenever possible.
For me, it probably make little sense; it’s a habit from many years of using Markdown, where one of the key benefits is that the source code is extremely readable. This is much less of a concern in TiddlyWiki, where the source code is usually looked at only in order to edit it. But still, when I can, I do so, this is much easier to read in Markdown source than even the best-structured HTML:
| Item | Count | Unit Price | Total Price |
| :---------------- | :---: | ---------: | ----------: |
| Teddy Bear | 2 | 24.00 | 48.00 |
| Rubber Ball | 5 | 2.00 | 10.00 |
| Skateboard | 1 | 53.00 | 53.00 |
The fairly subtle colon positions in the divider line sets the column text-alignment is useful and unobtrusive, and it would be easy enough to add row attributes, but I can’t think of any unobtrusive syntax to handle cell attributes.
That doesn’t stop me from wanting it!
That generates this, BTW:
Item Count Unit Price Total Price Teddy Bear 2 24.00 48.00 Rubber Ball 5 2.00 10.00 Skateboard 1 53.00 53.00
And what a great word, facetious
, all the vowels, in order: fAcEtIOUs
! Make it facetiously
, and we add the “and sometimes ‘y’” as well, also in order…