- This is an position I do not agree with, unless you confine it to Javascript.
- I think it not only appropriate but a duty to question claims I am confident are wrong. An assertion of truth is not necessarily the truth.
- What you have said may be true in a specific context, I argue it is not true in another.
Like wise, read my extensive content - starting with TiddlyWiki as a modelling tool - let's discuss that led to this thread and my assertion that the OT and referential integrity does not need hooks to solve, even if there is value obtaining these hooks.
- keep in mind I am calling for more discussion about the details of perceived gaps because I believe I have a full suit of solutions.
There remains a prolific reversion to Javascript when native TiddlyWiki can already do it and if and when we can establish a gap we need to remedy it in tiddlywiki not by enabling bespoke plugins.
When this is the case it is advisable to ask questions of clarification and consider if you should say anything at all. I believe you have already taken me to task in the past for stating “I have not had the chance to read the full thread”, I hope this is not an example of the same thing but without saying you had not read it?, I would have thought the issues would be clear if you read the thread in detail, and you would also See @Charlie_Veniot is of a similar view.
The sad thing is I stated very early
So it is disappointing it takes so much effort to disagree, and put an argument that others are contradicting. I only want an exchange of ideas, not subject to people piling in and supporting their tribe.