@dongrentianyu please consider my concern here.
Your reliance on AI should be kept to a minimum if you then take its output to inform your submission to talk.tiddlywiki. There is no substitution for learning to become a subject matter expert in tiddlywiki if it is to be one of your key software platforms. I have experimented with LLM’s and their ability to support TiddlyWiki and they are somewhat limited and keep providing false answers with confidence.
- It would be quite unfair if you keep presenting questions where the community is forced to respond to errors from LLM’s, when, if there was no LLM in the picture it would be easier to help.
I know in this case you were only using it to understand the console log, but you are introducing another factor where an error can exist. You have used LLM’s in other ways in other posts.
- Please use LLM’s to learn, but please independantly verify what they suggest before presenting it as fact
- Thank you for telling us when you do use it, this is very importiant, but please also try and avoid going directly from LLM to talk.tiddlywiki.
Opinion
The use of the term A.I. when people are refering to modern LLM’s is hype and vaporwear. At best we can call it machine learing. In my opinion LLM’s are just another step in machine sense and interpretation like Optical Character Recognision, voice recognition, image analysis etc… we are much further from A.I. than people who are selling products, would want you to believe.