Dear friends
I use the filters below in my knowledge base and it works
[!is[system]get[text]split[ ]splitregexp[(.)]!is[blank]count[]]
However, the following official tutorials in English and Chinese will not work
It’s possible to have a filter that works for them to count the total number of words？
Any reply would be greatly appreciated
I think the splitregexp[(.)] is useless. It would return a capture group but you do not do anything with it. So IMO [!is[system]get[text]split[ ]!is[blank]count[]] should be a good enough approximation.
Thank you very much for your answer
Divide 550058 by 48617 to 11.3, and search again by [!is[system]get[text]split[ ]!is[blank]count[]] to search again Chinese total number of words in the official tutorial is 74615, and multiply it by the scale factor of 11.3 to get about 844202.19 characters
When I add or subtract a character such as “1” in a tiddler, the results of the filtered search do not change [!is[system]get[text]split[ ]!is[blank]count[]]，This may be due to the statistical precision of the filter
[splitregexp[(.)]] to [splitregexp[(.)]]count[]] will not cause tiddlywiki to freeze
I did not take Chinese characters into account. Since I do not know how to split them, you should ignore my first comment.
If you’re looking for a total character count, you could try [!is[system]get[text]split[]!is[blank]count[]]. This may be slow in a large wiki!
This doesn’t differentiate between Chinese and English characters, though, so the count will be somewhat inflated by English words (each “TiddlyWiki” will add 10 characters), punctuation, etc. For a rough estimate, it may be good enough.
Thank you very much for your answer
It seems that the new word count filter does not work for the official forums in both Chinese and English
The word count for my own knowledge base shows up normally, and when I add new characters to any tiddler, the filter results can also be dynamically added by one. Compared to the initial filter [!is[system]get[text]split[ ]splitregexp[(.)]!is[blank]count[]], an increase of 100,000 words
I admit I’m not sure what’s happening there. It works for me on the English version of the site, and I’d expect the numbers for the Chinese version to be significantly smaller.
Regardless, I’m glad it’s working in your wiki, at least!
Really speechless, use the firefox browser to test the official word count filter works perfectly, no longer error
I’ve been using the Edge browser to run local tiddlywiki and surf online tiddlywiki before
It seems that a more powerful browser is needed for tiddlywiki
