Right. Very Mohfte and not Tufte.
Thank you, Saq. Certainly, your syntax is significantly more refined than mine.
Could this used the already-defined-in-HTML tag <aside>? It looks like it’s used in exactly the same way as the <sidenote> ... </sidenote> suggestion, or does using existing html tags make it trickier?
(noting that I only learned about the aside tag yesterday while looking for something else and am watching this Tufte thread with interest, but not yet played with a Tufte/TW setup)
3 Likes
Absolutely! We only need to use it like <aside class="sidenote">...</aside>. This is because users may have their own use of aside.
Give a try, it works for your proposal.
5 Likes
Hi @Mohammad,
Just having a poke at my wiki and I noticed that the Tufte wasn’t being tufty.
I Have tried dropping your ‘Tufte Styles’ Link into an empty wiki and tiddlywiki.com the only side notes which appear are denoted by <div class="marginnote"> the other methods don’t.
Never mind. The tiddler tufte-lite/procedures also needs to be exported.
1 Like
Not surprising since it never was a Tufte.
And never could have been.
It is a decent design approach.
It is a Mohfte.
It’s author @Mohammad is a nice bloke.
Happy updates!
Ok… I’ll bite…
Why, when based on the style of of Tufte can it no be Tufte and what is Mohfte or is that just a word you’ve coined to mean ‘Tufte like or haveing some aspects of Tufte while not being Tufte’?
1 Like
It is a portmanteau (word blending) of “MOHammad” and “tuFTE”.
1 Like
Of course it is! Silly me.
Just another addendum that just caught me out. In order for the Mohfte style to be applied the tiddler needs a class field containing tufte-lite to apply the Mohfte style.
1 Like
Great idea, @Mohammad – seeing this pop up in the recent topics inspired me to play around with a similar concept that allows one to easily add notes and figures as they’re reading 
1 Like