As a practicing modern skeptic i was recently discussing how to evaluate sources. There are flags that indicate unreliability in a source however even in apparently reliable sources the depth of work needed to validate claims can be exhausting. With tiddlywiki as a tool i hope to make this easier.
It seems to me the aforementioned dialectical method we would be well served to record such information in a way that it remains open to question and review. For myself and i expect most of us we record information in tiddlywiki as if it is fact, when many classes of information, may actually only be a best guess, if not ultimately incorrect.
Methodologies that encourage scepticism and critical thinking about what we know we record and subsequently use would add substantial quality to personal or team knowledge. This may include presenting out of the box tools for extended research and validation.