Thank you for the feedback.
Excellent. I am aware that there is a lot of prior work in the community. I am hoping that we can collaborate together to make official plugins for the basic infrastructure needed for working with LLMs. I am not at all wedded to the implementation that I have used; we need to settle on the best.
Yes! Although the demo in its current form doesn’t make a compelling case for this. I am hoping we can put together some examples to tell the story better.
You’ve been an early adopter for LLMs in TiddlyWiki, and I am particularly keen that we can bring your work to the wider community. For example, I would be open to TidGi-Desktop replacing TiddlyDesktop (or at least becoming an official upgrade path).
Ouch, thanks @Scott_Sauyet. The syntax is indeed an LLM hallucination. I’m sure everyone who’s experimented with LLMs generating wikitext or filters has encountered these kinds of issues.
The usual fix for these situations is to provide documentation that the LLM can consult. We need to explore that for TW.
Only for this particular audience. We’re trying to present them with a familiar paradigm, but it doesn’t limit TW itself.
TiddlyDesktop does already support Node.js wikis which store their tiddlers as individual files. It is not a widely used feature, and I think needs some work to make it smoother. In the meantime, I believe TiddlyGittly from @linonetwo also offers the capability.
No, my point was that Obsidian might improve their support for LLMs, which might make a TW-based solution less attractive to the audience we’re talking about.
Best wishes
Jeremy