In the TranscludeWidget docs
I want to clarify that the “$variable” attribute also concerns procedures. I’m thinking of posting a PR to change the following
…into
Name of the variable or procedure to transclude
so I’m just wondering if this is a good phrasing. (It wouldn’t surprise me if someone says that a “procedure” is a “variable” so my information is redundant - but this is not obvious for a reader; so what do you suggest instead then?)
You are right. But it also concerns to functions and widgets, how you can say in the examples*[1]* of Basics Operations section.
The redundant information is great to avoid confusions. But I think it is not necessary to explain it every time. What do you think about adding a link to https://tiddlywiki.com/#Variables? As DataTiddler, plugin, … have in the table pointed by you.
[1] Maybe It is not clear that they are examples, for new readers.
a link to the Variables tiddler is a great idea and it would allow readers to navigate the wiki more easily too.
