While the CSS rules in the updated TiddlyTools/Stylesheet/ListTree are written more compactly (a more than 25% reduction in code), they should have exactly the same effect as the previous version.
The primary differences are the use of “nested” declarations under the .list-tree class wrapper, reductions in whitespace/newlines and the removal of comments that, in my opinion, weren’t really all that helpful to begin with.
Also note that this CSS is an adaptation of http://listtree.tiddlyspot.com which was published by @twMat way back in January 2017 and is, in turn, based on Draw a Tree Structure With Only CSS by “kqr”, published in November, 2014.
The only difference from those implementations is that I’ve added support for “ol” (ordered list items) in addition to the previous rules for “ul” (unnumbered list items). This is important when used with the TWCore <<toc>> macros, since they use re-styled “ol” elements to render the “table-of-contents” tree output.
I tested the latest version of TiddlyTools/Stylesheet/ListTree on https://TiddlyWiki.com. Using the “T1” - “T6” example tiddlers from your OP it seems to be working just fine, so perhaps it is, as you said, something that you “goofed up”. Since the previous version of TiddlyTools/Stylesheet/ListTree was working in your TiddlyWiki, there must be something about how you updated to the latest version that broke things. Let’s try to figure that out.
-e
