I’m working on embedding the TW Image Editor for use on tablet (e.g. <$edit-bitmap tiddler="set/notepad/pad-page"/>). So far …
I am trying to understand TW’s Image Editor better.
I have 2 questions …
Q #1: In the Image Editor what is this empty drop-down for? …
Q #2: Do you know where TW derived it’s Image Editor?
Any links to that?
Just asking
TT
The “empty” dropdown is for “more actions”, which shows any toolbar items that have been “hidden” via the $:/ControlPanel > Appearance > Toolbars > EditorToolbars checkboxes.
In the normal wikitext editor, the dropdown shows the “heading 4”, “heading 5” and “heading 6” toolbar buttons.
However, in the bitmap editor, none of the toolbar buttons are hidden, so the dropdown is empty.
To hide the button when the dropdown is empty, it would need a VERY complex condition filter to first determine which toolbar buttons apply to the current tiddler type by getting each toolbar button’s definition and evaluating that button’s condition filter and then checking to see if the corresponding $:/config/EditorToolbarButtons/Visibility/... tiddler’s text is “hide”.
While such a condition filter MIGHT be possible, it certainly would incur considerable processing overhead just to suppress an empty dropdown… and the necessary syntax makes even MY brain melt.
-e
Update:
I managed to come up with a condition filter without completely melting my brain:
[all[shadows+tiddlers]tag[$:/tags/EditorToolbar]!has[draft.of]] -[[$:/core/ui/EditorToolbar/more]]
:filter[subfilter{!!condition}]
:map[<currentTiddler>addprefix[$:/config/EditorToolbarButtons/Visibility/]]
+[text[hide]]
+[limit[1]]
Notes:
condition applies to the current tiddler typeSo… it’s POSSIBLE… but still UGLY.
Whoa! That is complex ugly!
First off — thanks for explaining "that drop down does nothing".
For now I’ll just ignore it.
I was surprised I couldn’t easily hide it directly via one CSS rule.
Anyway, thanks
TT