I dragged tiddlers from 5.1.23 TW to https://tiddlywiki.com/ and then exported as JSON file.
Chinese Five Spice.json (5.3 KB)spice.json (5.4 KB)
Check Blank 3.json (6.5 KB)
I want Check Blank 3 Tiddler to be updated with the new field, at present it updates spice tiddler
The files seem to be packed with javascript related to geolocation. Do you have anything related to geo in your plugins?
I dont think so, although I did try a google maps TW a while back, that might be it
Well, check your plugins list. You really don’t want to be injecting javascript into other people’s code!
You might try exporting the tiddlers as tid files.
I will export as .tid files into new 5.2.0 TW and see if that’s any better
Thanks
Mark_S
Mark_S
here are the exported .tid files
I have not imported them into a new 5.20.0 yet
Do they still contain javascript stuff
Check Blank 3.tid (6.4 KB)
Chinese Five Spice.tid (5.3 KB)
spice.tid (5.4 KB)
How can I tell if any other tiddlers contain it?
Scot
Yes. what plugins do you have?
Hmm. Do you have any browser extensions that might be inserting code?
This is a post formatting error. Discourse is parsing variable references which causes them to disappear from the rendered output.
For example, the line you reference should appear as: <$text text={{{ [enlist<ingredients>join[, ]] }}}/>, but because of Discourse parsing, the <ingredients> syntax is omitted.
To properly render the posted code, it should be enclosed in a “code block” (i.e., preceded and followed by separate lines containing tripled backticks (```).
encryptTiddler
ticklers GSD5 Tickler plugin
kookma plugins
searchwikis
solution
toc TOC
Shiraz
Tiddler Commander
Timelines
Todolist
utility
subsume-giffmex
simple search - telmiger
DetailsWidget-telmiger
Link to Tabs
QR Code
Relink
Key-values wikilabs
Mobiledragdrop
@EricShulman
thanks Eric my mistake, I should indeed enclose code in backticks
<$text text={{{ [enlist<ingredients>join[, ]] }}}/>
regards
Scot
That’s a lot of plugins. I would make a backup, then disable the plugins, save, reload, and see if export works correctly.
There’s no point in doing a lot of work in your TW if it’s corrupted! So getting that fixed should be first on your agenda.
Sadly, I have a lot of single TW’s on different topics.
Probably nothing meaningful, I try different plugins and code examples.
I do have a todo and shopping list (your version) with all these ingredients/items
Can I open tiddlers and copy the code into a fresh TW tiddler or does that not work.
@Mark_S
Deleted all plugins except core from TW
Exported tiddler as .tid and imported to clean TW
Still shows javascript code
Starting afresh
Thanks for your help Mark_S
Scot
Did you check for overridden shadow tiddlers. The coding error shown when trying to import that mysterious mixture has to come from somewhere.
Thanks for your reply Birthe.
I didn’t check for overridden shadow tiddlers, but I’m not sure how I would identify them.
I have started to build my TWs again but have been trying to import any new files as JSON or .tid files as suggested by Mark_S
It seems to highlight other users tiddlers as being problematic.
I dont want to scare anyone but I think they best follow the instructions too
If you want to check for overriden shadow tiddlers you can go to $:/AdvancedSearch, use filter search and the drop down has a selection of filters…among them overridden shadow tiddlers.
One of your uploaded .json tiddlers I tried to import - said script error - some wrong sign in the wrong position in the first line.
I don’t know, but it might be a “small” thing like that mixing it all up. No matter from where it came - you can have imported it from someone.
I really understand your wish to start all over fresh.
I’ll give your suggestion a try. Reply again tomorrow with my findings.
Thanks for your help
Scot
@Birthe
I deleted all overridden shadow tiddlers, saved wiki and reloaded it - exported tiddlers in JSON and .tid format still showing error at line 1 and javascript geo code.
Upgraded the tw to 5.2.0 using online upgrade.html on tiddlywiki.com - same errors
Thanks
Scot
Scot, as mark suggested the format would be;
<$list filter="[tag[ingredient]tag[spice]sort[title]]">
<$checkbox field={{!!title}} checked={{!!title}} unchecked="" default=""> {{!!title}}</$checkbox>
</$list>
It is safe to do this in 5.2.0 because the field names have being liberated but earlier versions demand that the tiddler title maps to the field naming standards. Fine if they are single words, like ingredient, spice.
However I assume you want a recipe to have the list of spices available on that recipe as fields once checked? so say I selected “marjoram” you will have a field marjoram=“marjoram” perhaps you could set the value to a standard serve eg marjoram={{!!standards-serve}} and then if you want you can change the standard serve.
However;
Your example needs work I think, because you will be creating this field in the ingredient in the spice tiddler, not the current tiddler (presumably the recipe.
Perhaps you need something like this;
If current tiddler is the recipe perhaps like this; (untested)
<$list filter="[tag[ingredient]tag[spice]sort[title]]" variable=ingredient>
<$checkbox field=<<ingredient>> checked={{{ [<ingredient>get[standards-serve]] }}} unchecked="" default=""> <<ingredient>> </$checkbox>
</$list>
@TW_Tones
Thanks your example works exactly how I wanted it to.
The standards-serve field is a nice addition.
<$list filter="[tag[ingredient]tag[spice]sort[title]]" variable=ingredient>
<$checkbox field=<<ingredient>> checked={{{ [<ingredient>get[standards-serve]] }}} unchecked="" default=""> <<ingredient>> </$checkbox>
</$list>
Scot
1 Like