Visit the prerelease on the web, explore the release note and try out the new features. Let us know if the release note or documentation is not clear
Use the prerelease upgrader at https://tiddlywiki.com/prerelease/upgrade.html to make a test upgrade of your own single file wiki and try out your usual workflows. It is suggested that you use a copy of your real life wikis, ie complex wikis that youâve tweaked and personalised over a long time, so that the new version is tested under tough conditions
Please wait until the official release before updating your day-to-day wikis, and remember the first rule of TiddlyWiki: to make sure to take (and verify) backups before doing anything risky.
This is of small importance, but the dog demo has some spacing issues of the loaded images, especially if multiple images are loaded: the images go outside of the tiddler, the titles overlap with images, sometimes there are some unnecessary spaces.
Both solutions from @EricShulman and @pmario work well, I have seen no overlapping or redundant whitespace. The height is of course no longer limited to 300px, but it looks good anyway, with all the images displayed one under another at the same width but different heights.
Since this isnât a v5.3.1 problem it would be worth opening a separate thread for it.
The issue here is probably the way that the edit-text widget will in some circumstances create an iframe to contain the text editor. This makes it hard to apply CSS to these editors.
This seems to be unrelated to v5.3.1 release, but good it was noticed anyway.
There is a lot of documentation missing or needing improvement. Feel free to add these missing examples yourself, if you are comfortable with basic TW editing and have some spare time!
Refer to other existing macro examples on formatting, tagging, and using documentation macros (which make creating examples easier).
Saqâs PR Maker (forum thread) makes submitting documentation edits really easy, it doesnât require any knowledge of GitHub.
I see now that the planned release of 5.3.1 did not happen on 7 Aug as announced but has been re-scheduled to sometime in the 18-21st time frame. Sadly I did not verify that the bug fix 5.3.1 release actually occurred before I attempted to upgrade. Another lesson observed.
Luckily I donât follow instructions and neither install tiddlywiki globally nor will I use sudo for anything unless I am very confident that there is zero likelihood for a screw up. Plus, I create an archive of my npm local install of tiddlywiki so I can back out an upgrade that doesnât go as planned. And none of that ever gets pushed to my âproductionâ tiddlywiki on Node.js until I check things out locally first. So it was easy, but frustrating, for me to back out the 5.3.0 with known bugs. My precautions might suggest to the reader that this has happened to me before.
I would be more willing to kick the tires on planned upgrades â cloning the github repo, etc. â if doing so did not threaten to mess up other, npm-dependent, tools including functioning tiddlywiki. Having instructions for tire kickers on how to back out the infrastructure changes - as well as the frequent cautions to back up wiki contents - should things go south might encourage others to do the same.
I am no npm expert by any means, but I do mess around with other npm applications that I am not willing to potentially break to test tiddlywiki. So Iâll just list these resources that lead me to believe I am not wrong about my misgivings and precautions.