Hello everyone,
I stumbled upon this site https://www.noteapps.info which lists note taking apps and their features. The site seems reasonable and useful, but to my surprise, does not yet include TiddlyWiki.
Searching through the FAQ; seems like app inclusion is guided by voting. TiddlyWiki was listed there under future consideration.
https://nextnoteapps.featureupvote.com
@TiddlyTweeter maybe try this direct link to vote? TiddlyWiki - Next NoteApps
@fastfreddy nice find!
Like all this stuff on net now … someone will need push it / promote it / upvote it.
Mostly these sites are not doing deep analysis. They are simply working on votes.
The reality of TW isn’t anything to do with such. Getting votes is all that counts on that site.
But my general impression is that most active TW people aren’t proactive in this way. I mean it is a slog to (1) find the sites; (2) join them; just to vote-up.
IF you gave a link that a user here could just click to upvote TW then I’m sure some would.
But, basically, I don’t think the internet is usually fair. It is a complex “obscure game”.
Just a comment
TT
Upvoted.
In the last few hours the Votes have gone from 11 to 28 …
Keep on voting at TiddlyWiki - Next NoteApps
TT
34 now.
And Craft has broken the pattern.
40
currently 43, the only one above it that hasn’t been done yet is zettlr, so it’s probably next in line.
Once you get to the top, who provides the description, categories, and updates?
I voted, however Lets not be too aggressive, and use fake methods, leastt tiddlywiki be removed from the list because of apparent manipulation.
Ironically this seems a bit self-introspective, I’m reminded of Andy Matuschak:
People who write extensively about note-writing rarely have a serious context of use.
Although I have nothing against review and recommendation sites, even the spammy ones, it does look like whoever made this has good intentions. All press is good press, I assume.
