Triggered by your post, I wondered what would happen if the “virtual” tiddler titles were directly treated as filter syntax.
This is probably a really bad idea, but I toyed around with it and on the surface, at least, it works. I was actually very surprised since these virtual tiddler titles contain square brace characters. That goes counter to the warning you see when creating a new tiddler with a title containing | [ ] { } characters.
Put the following in a tiddlers on tiddlywiki.com and add the tag: $:/tags/ViewTemplate
With such little code you enable the display of “titles that are filters”.
It once again throws up in the air “what is a title”?
It also shows how much more can be done with “missing tiddlers”
The resulting recent list could be just one of multiple selectable views, although I find “recent” is one of the most common lists I make use of.
This is certainly another source of “creative inspiration” that leads one’s minds to explore other possibilities.
What if such tiddlers (missing filter titles) could not be made into real tiddlers.
One thought is to make a system namespace beginning with [
I won’t detail it here, but this has inspired me to new ideas about “real virtual tiddlers” . I must find an existing topic or start a new one to discuss this.
I now the concept of virtual tiddlers has become popular recently, but I am, still tempted to call these missing tiddlers, because if you create them, they “kinda lose their virtual status”. However in your example they retain their recent list.
I think one of the main reasons is if you do use such characters in titles it gets tricky referring to such tiddlers elsewhere, especially with [ ] and { } which are part of links and transclusion, that is, where does the title name begin or end?
However with careful use of TiddlyWiki script they can still be used, in some cases.
Tag Doc for a document tagged with multiple Domains (e.g. Growth Stage and Canola).
Filtering
In each Domain, I list all literature which are tagged with this Domain or their Descendants (i.e. Growth Stage with either tag, (Growth Stage or BBCH Scale or Zadoks Growth Scale)).
In each Doc, I list all literature which are listed in all Domains (i.e. literature with tag [(Canola or Triazine Tolerant Canola) and (Growth Stage or BBCH Scale or Zadoks Growth Scale).
I had this idea too, but I thought I wouldn’t need it that often. When I keep going back to the results of a given filter, I usually put <<list-links>> macro with this filter in a tiddler with a human-readable and writable title.
But of course this is a very intriguing idea, as all other ways of conveying some information in the title itself.
Fascinating. I feel as though I’ve gone looking for this functionality before, although I can’t quite recall where. I don’t know if it’s a “really bad idea”, but it’s certainly intriguing.
<$list filter="[<currentTiddler>is[missing]]">
<!-- OUTER LIST GETS THIS OUT OF THE WAY FOR REAL TIDDLERS, which should not have filter-like names anyway! -->
<$let titleAsFilter=<<currentTiddler>>>
<$list filter="[subfilter<titleAsFilter>!sort[modified]limit[10]]"/>
</$let>
</$list>
I may well add an “open all these” button — So this ends up functioning much like the filter-pill tool developed by @TW_Tones