Hi @TW_Tones the focus of this policy is about publishing the raw, unreviewed output of LLMs. So it is indeed perfectly OK to publish an LLM-generated solution that you have tested and verified.
Your recent post about unload event handlers makes a good concrete example to discuss.
The majority of that post is the output of ChatGPT summarising very basic principles of web development, without any insight or applicability to TiddlyWiki. It would not be useful to a TiddlyWiki end user nor to an experienced developer. I would argue that including the ChatGPT output here adds no value to the post. Anyone interested can consult an LLM for themselves.
Worse is that you are burning through the time and energy of readers. A relevant quote that I like: Why should I read it if you can’t be bothered to write it?