personally i dont use such tools
and i think asked that question in another thread
because i wanted to understand the thinking of the statement maker
****
for me the answer is not the point
the journey to get to how the conclusion was reached
is likly much more informative than
just: use this method-x
wrt to the title
the premise which
is imho false
With an LLM is all about how good the your Question is
i strike though & replaced the personalized affectations
( because i think they shift the frame in an unhelpful way )
see also : wrt:“exag-gerated claims about artificial intelligence”
(products)
The input
does not cause the output
in an authorial sense,
much like input to a library search engine
does not cause
relevant articles and books
to be written ---.
The respective authors wrote those,
not the search query!
.OSF
The mind boggles what good questions I have not yet asked.
hear is one : can you do that without LLM?
and another
**** why not invent&test 
*your own* methods to answer this question?
next is way out side the scope of the training data
or
even the abilities
of any one other than @EricShulman to answer!
why did Eric make this statement ?
what informs that opinion ?
is it correct ?
(even @TW_Tones had to do the test for the last one… why not cut out the middle man 
)
… not that im hear for grading
or even not that i haven’t ( in the distant past )
received an assessment of “needs more effort” my self 
and perhaps even
it is the case that we lack the appropriate tools for collective
collaboration
some part of that is arguably why ppl join this very forum !
… not that im hear for grading
nonetheless …
2 / for effort
-1 no mention of method’s / cant reproduce from given data