Thank you- I felt so hussled with the subscription offers, that I did not look for the API
But it would be cool anyhow to have deepseek as a possibilty.
And as a german teacher I would love to have the IONOS Api implemented because this is DGSVO which meas subject to the General Data Protection Regulation which is necessary to be used in places like schools in europe.
I bet deepseek is not
1 Like
Hi, @well-noted IONOS claims to be compatible with OpenAI
And not to forget: The next month is still free of any cost.
I would be especially hesitant to be sending personal data onto Chinese servers… And I’m not seeing very much about Deepseek to make it especially appealing over the existing options
@JanJo, it does seem like Hugging face has an open source version of the model that can be installed and run locally.
A good reason to get the oLlama version working.
1 Like
I think the release of Deepseeks R1 as OpenSource is one of the reasons for the big buzz.
But I cannot find clear instructions what ressources it needs - so far I got no 3090GPU.
As said for privacy reasons I would even be more interested in unsing the IONOS-cloud.
Hi @well-noted how do I get wikisage going with anthropic. I entered my Anthropic API-Key, and it still asks me about my openAI AI (that I do not have yet).
@JanJo, before I get too wordy, will you please try something for me?
Locate or create the shadow tiddler titled $:/plugins/Notestreams/Expanded-ChatGPT/model-list
in that, please paste:
gpt-4o-min
gpt-4o
gpt-4
gpt-3.5-turbo
gpt-4o-2024-08-06
dall-e-3
o1-preview
claude-3-opus-20240229
claude-3-sonnet-20240229
claude-3-haiku-20240307
claude-3-5-haiku-latest
claude-3-5-sonnet-latest
After doing that, you should see that list reflected in the model list dropdown
If you don’t, let me know. It is possible that I have an update I need to push, but you should be able to add any openAI or anthropic model to that list, and it will route the api correctly.
You should also be able to add the list and any additional models to the model list from the config tab.
It seems the edit-box for the model list, within the config tab of the plugin is still using the ExpandedChatGPT reference, rather than the Wikisage reference. I’ll need to dust off my working version and push an update.
That’s probably timely, in any case 
I just pasted the list, now the claudes appear in the dropdown - but I do not get clear visual feedback what I have chosen and an alert still asks for the openAI api
Please send a screenshot?
This is what I see when I select the o1 model and then click the dropdown button again:
This indicates the model that is currently selected.
You are correct that this is not the most communicative feedback, I am thinking I will incorporate a small indicator next to the chat about which model is selected
Hmm. Can I see that openAI Message?
Please add anything to the openAI edit box, which I imagine should make the message go away.
Have confirmed that this is how it works on my empty. I see the message, it is an artifact from when it was only OpenAI, it will be resolved in the V1
1 Like
I am afraid I can’t, the alert crashes the screenshot addons.
It really cures the problem to input anything.
1 Like
I appreciate you taking the time to talk this through with me, there haven’t been many people who’ve tried it, and apparently you’re the first to attempt to use Claude without first entering an OpenAI key
I’m adding it to my list of V.1 fixes
1 Like
I guess this is because many people do not know an API-Key is pay as you go and not necessarily suscription. This was new for me too.
Could definitely be, I know that it has come up before and I have attempted to clarify – however, this is the first time I’ve felt confident the distinction was understood.
Hey, well-noted, here the same, I try it yesterday …fyi
Hi @2right4, I’m glad to hear you tried it
Are you saying that you received the same message as @JanJo when trying to use the plugin with only an Anthropic key? Did following my suggestion to add some placeholder content to the OpenAI key tiddler work for you?
I appreciate the user feedback, the lack of such has been one of the major reasons I’ve slowed my roll on releases: so far everything I’ve been working on has been pretty insular to my own experience using the plugin. Receiving more feedback will increase the quality and consistency of releases going forward
Just spun up an API key and now I have WikiSage running. Am I missing an option somewhere for it to automatically save my chat history as a tiddler?
No, but that should be pretty simple to implement.it currently saves the last 5 messages, for context because I didn’t want it accumulating too much space in people’s tiddlers by default and because copy/paste works, but I think a toggle to achieve that could be implemented.
Tell me more about what you’re thinking as your ideal usecase. Would it be always on, something you’d set in config? Or would it be a toggle on the interface that you could select as needed? Or some other third thing?
Maybe a conditional you can set when you’re calling the widget? That would allow you to select a tiddler name and have multiple instances with that name that would all add to that one tiddler, if that were of any interest