That’s the problems with icons. I took it to mean, “I’m watching this for further developments.”
2 Likes
Something like that could / should be added to the intro to the forum.
Interesting. Many Anglo cultures would see those as Googly Eyes or “wide eyes” (=either of astonishment or nervous trepidation).
It’s a Rabbit Hole deep-diving such emojis et al.
I use 
when the provided solution is so perfect it could take us to the stars.
I thought 
meant the message “said it all”, and I would use it like 
(straight to the point) but with an added conclusive meaning (game over).
Looks like there’s a great cultural part in the interpretation of those icons, I hope I never misused them up to the point of hurting someone’s feelings here.
Fred
2 Likes
My understanding is that thumbs-up used to mean something profane in some cultures. I haven’t heard that in awhile, so maybe those cultures adjusted their interpretation to match the larger audience.
Yes. In actual posting I’d use it for a vigorous innovation.
The recent Resizer is science. (Rocket Science}
Yes. In parts of Southern Italy it would not be wise to gesture it unless you were intimate already.
What happened to the Flat Hand. Neither this nor that…
for @tw-FRed — which I use (and generally take) to mean “I agree with 100% of what you said.” For me, this has some overlap with 
, which is “This post deserves an award,” but to me, has a stronger implication of agreement.
I didn’t have any particular associations with prior to seeing it on Talk TW, but based on the way I see it used here, I’ve come to interpret it the way Fred does, possibly with an added shade of “You’re unstoppable!”
I see where you’re coming from, but personally (as an American predominantly familiar with the English-speaking internet) I’d say 
tends to mean “watching this keenly” — perhaps nervously or even judgmentally, but often just with interest or anticipation. And when I see it here, I (like @Mark_S) take it to mean “I’m watching this for further developments”. 
would be the “astonishment” emoji for me… and in my experience, most people wouldn’t use for astonishment when is readily available.
And to the original topic of the thread, I really appreciate @pmario’s stance on discouraging forum negativity. I won’t say that I’ve never seen a message that might have briefly tempted me to use 
if it were readily available (and yes, TT, your OP comes to mind!) but I like to think I wouldn’t have done it: it smacks of unconstructive criticism, and that would feel inappropriate and disrespectful to the community culture Talk TW has fostered. This is by far the most mature, respectful internet forum I’ve ever encountered, and I think it would be a shame to erode that.
On the other hand, the broader discussion of emoji usage is fascinating and seems to be illuminating for all, so thank you for facilitating that!
You mean the symbol used by police to indicate, “Halt! Stop moving!” ?
Maybe the beauty of icons is that none of use know what they actually mean, allowing us to talk past each other. I still don’t know if “clapping hands” is sincere or ironic.
1 Like
I think that’s a matter of context — which often includes the broader culture of the site. On Talk TW, I would universally assume it was sincere. On more toxic sites (I hesitate to call them “communities”) like Youtube or Twitter, I’d give 
at least 50/50 odds of being ironic.
Right. Cultural & Personal diffs too.
Much of the net thrives on liminal meanings in emojis, badges, avatars etc.
Rarely does anyone actually investigate what users believe they mean.
One prod at it and you’ll see the huge diversity.
Same thing. Watching, anticipating. Possibly nervously. Possibly with joy.
Essentially deferred.
Na. The Horror.
Surely that’s 
?
(
)
Yes in upright palm forward position.
I was also thinking of “cosi cosi” in Italy which means “so so”; “neither this nor that”. Indicated by a twisting flat hand gesture.
None of them have intrinsic meanings.
That plasticity itself interests me.
We likely have different thresholds.
I completely agree with your perspective, @Mario. Downvoting without explanation often feels unnecessarily harsh and discourages constructive dialogue. Taking the time to explain why you disagree promotes understanding and respect, which is far more valuable than a silent negative vote. Ignoring posts you don’t like is a respectful approach, and expressing emotions through reactions can convey feelings without aggression. Your viewpoint supports a healthier, more thoughtful community interaction.
6 Likes
This forum is much more personal than YouTube. I think users here can assume, since there are usually responses, that silence is either an uncommited response or else an implicit downvote. Silence is bad enough. Downvotes would feel personal.
1 Like
You are right. I am always happy to see, that a new user, after interacting for some time with the community, adds a more personal avatar to their account.
Some users even request an account “name change”, which can only be done by @admins. Usually sending a private post to @admins.
I think this shows great trust in the community. I like that.
4 Likes
Ya know, if I see thumbs down now I’m just going to start giggling about this lol
I say if we ever use it it should be for a positive use, like we take a page from the ancient romans and make the thumbs down a symbol for keeping something around =“keep the post going!”
1 Like