Just out of curiousity, I was wondering if, when SJCL was implemented into tiddlywiki, was AES 256 chosen and adopted, or a different amount? It appears to match the provided minified code, however I wasn’t sure what level that was either And, not completely related but, does the encrypt individual…

[image] Query: How secure is the inbuilt encryption option in TW? I did a little digging, TiddlyWiki uses the SJSC Library and does not pass any configuration (as far as I could tell). Therefor it uses the SJSC defaults. Unfortunatly, the SJSC documentation d…

SJCL was integrated into TiddlyWiki 5 in September 2012 in this commit . I chose SJCL because it was the most widely used and trusted open source JS cryptographic library at the time. Nowadays one might be tempted to use the new browser crypto APIs but it’s actually convenient for TW to have the same…

[image] arunnbabu81: This discussion might be of help to you It did indeed! The answer is aes 128 in ccm mode! [image] Query: How secure is the inbuilt encryption option in TW? This looks like the default is: AES 128 in CCM mode. I’d say that is pretty good! IIRC this is the same default …

What level of encryption was chosen for TW's SJCL?

arunnbabu81 March 9, 2024, 8:24am 2

This discussion might be of help to you