TiddlyWiki as universal software?

[TW_Tones]

@Scott_Sauyet

I would suggest that if there is some strong use for a subset of TW’s functionality, that the first step would be to start defining the public interface that would be included.

Yes, this overlayer of an interface for public use of underlying features, tiddlywiki has the technology already we just need to build more cases of it so people know how to use it.

• TiddlyWiki already hides the intricacies of html, JS and CSS from the user.

[tomzheng]

@pmario

All of the at is true. May be with TWX it would be possible to use everything we have learned to last 20 years (TWc and TW5) to create a new “optimised” version. For TWX we can remove redundant and deprecated functionality, that we have to keep at the moment for backwards compatibility reasons.

Not backwards compatible or backwards compatible. Depends on the user. If there is much more 3rd party development than core development, then backward compatibility is required, e.g. windows. if the 3rd party development is not large enough, then no backward compatibility is required, e.g. python.