Hi there, hi Mohammad!
First, I may seem new here, but I’m following the projects since a while now and just wanted to thank you, and @jeremyruston and actually everyone contributing to TW and the wonderful plugins’ ecosystem. I’m converting right now my post-guttenberg Phd thesis “manuscript” to an actual non linear pieces of texts that is matching our modern way of reading, thinking and writing, and I really enjoy it thanks to all of you guys. Cheers to that, I’m trying to follow the tracks of Molina : http://tesis.tiddlyspot.com
And @Mohammad, you are so facilitating this enterprise, maybe Molina would have loved this too back that time. I will share with you as soon it is ready.
Meanwhile, serious and quick question about APA7’ style.
Let’s say I want to quote you and this plugin, as for an example.
APA’ strict style would give something like:
Rahmani, M. (2022). Refnotes Plugin (1.8.4). "https://“doi.org”/"tw.refnotes.1.8.4
(what about italicizations of titles or journals?)
Let’s simplify, cause we don’t have a D.O.I., or an url yet, but it could/should be displayed eventually?
Rahmani, M. (2022). Refnotes Plugin (1.8.4).
Now, It seems that Refnotes would naturally output this:
Mohammad Rahmani. Refnotes Plugin (1.8.4). (2022)
Honestly and subjectively, I don’t really like APA anyway, but, it’s a standard, so… we have to comply. But I really prefer this way of presenting citations, because I’m also an human, and I don’t recall “Rahmani, M.” like a APA cog machine, just Mohammad Rahmani, because this is actually how I would call you If I had to. Right, this is confusing.
Anyway, this is not really a proposal for debates about APA’s way of thinking human-machines recognition, but I’m curious, why this way of presenting citations inside your popovers if it’s not APA7?
Cheers