The development of this plugin was a test run at finding a sustainable model for community driven and supported development, where community members contribute via discussion, ideas and donations. The discussions around the original concept and the subsequent fund raising happened here in this forum, and after my involvement began I did my best to make sure the discussion was end user friendly. However, from my perspective, there was very limited buy in and involvement from the community.
The reason that the Fission Webnative uploader was centre stage during development is because it was the only one actively supported enough via both discussion and OpenCollective funding.
We also had a community call in August 2021 that demoed the functionality using both Fission and Github uploaders, emphasized that the plugin was not Fission specific, and the presentation on the call was again designed for users without a developer background.
I have explained the status of the node.js uploader earlier in this thread, and the situation with the WebDAV uploader has not changed since you and I last discussed it. Both of these are experimental and something that I have worked on in my own time.
User contributions to move any of them further, whether they take the form of code contributions, help with fundraising via Open Collective, or helping to find developers to work on them would be highly appreciated.
This feedback would have been helpful during the development process, starting from the initial public discussions and including the beta testing phase, during which feedback was explicitly invited after the public demo on the community call. The terminology could still be changed if there was community consensus behind the change and a developer to take on the work.