King James Bible Wiki

[etardiff]

This is very slick and easily my favorite of the (prospective) layouts you’ve showed us, Scott! Whether it’s worth the fiddling to bring it to life… I don’t know. I don’t have a current need for a bible wiki myself, so my vote probably shouldn’t carry too much weight here. But if I did, this one seems like it’d be a joy to work with, and much easier to use to look up a specific verse.

It does remind me a bit of Cornell notes, which I believe you’ve worked with before. Perhaps you can reuse some of those strategies here?

[Scott_Sauyet]

@etardiff

This is very slick and easily my favorite of the (prospective) layouts you’ve showed us, Scott!

Mine too!

@etardiff

I don’t have a current need for a bible wiki myself, so my vote probably shouldn’t carry too much weight here.

By that measure, I shouldn’t have much of a vote either. This is all speculative, more on the line of, “What would be the best way to do this with TW?” And for that, both our votes count!

@etardiff

It does remind me a bit of Cornell notes, which I believe you’ve worked with before. Perhaps you can reuse some of those strategies here?

I can’t believe that they never crossed my mind! You’re right, there’s a large conceptual overlap with them. I will look at them again closely. I don’t expect that there will be much that carries over, but I really should have at least looked!