That come out in the wrong order … I need the order of the DD …
Just an example
TT
1 Like
With pleasure:
A checklist for grammer and spelling-mistakes to avoid them in future:
$ _data_Fehleranalyse.json (1.1 KB)
Must the non breaking spaces be there?
Perhaps they should be in the display process not the data key?
I assume you mean keys like "American Heritage"
That is no problem in data tiddlers.
I do it to prevent dictionary keys wrapping in render.
Nothing more.
TT
Which is more compact?
TT
This data only has the key but no values. Do you plan to use values? Otherwise this can just be treated as a list of titles.
A simple list output s the titles in natural order, so perhaps this is enough for you next coding step?
Here I simply extract the keys in order for your data set and @TiddlyTweeter’s day, since it has values I am turning them into links
Fehleranalyse
<$list filter="[{$:/data/Fehleranalyse}splitregexp[\n]]" variable=each-line>
<$text text={{{ [<each-line>split[:]first[]] }}}/><br>
</$list>
Linkdata
<$list filter="[{Linkdata}splitregexp[\n]]" variable=each-line>
<$text text={{{ [<each-line>split[:]first[]] }}}/><br>
</$list>
<$list filter="[{Linkdata}splitregexp[\n]]" variable=each-line>
<$link to={{{ [<each-line>split[:]last[]] }}} >{{{ [<each-line>split[:]first[]] }}}</$link><br>
</$list>
- however we need to add a wikify step to translate the
. - Once again I say deal with that at display time, not in the data.
I am afraid I need to stop soon as I am tired at 9:30pm on a Sunday evening.
- Let me know if either of you need more to continue.
I attempted to turn @TiddlyTweeter’s data into text (please give it in text form) it was fiddly with OCR
Linkdata.json (695 Bytes)
1 Like
Rename the input data from LinkData in my example.
I did a proof of concept and tested with FF, Edge and windows 11 today. It looks good. That’s the easy part.
The rest of the work that has to be done is the problem.
- There needs to be some discussion at GitHub, if it could go into the core.
- I did implement a new “suffix” … raw like so:
[[$:/data/Fehleranalyse]indexes:raw[]]- That should be backwards compatible
- The “raw” suffix may still have some unexpected / unknown side-effects
- eg using it like so:
[tag[test]indexes:raw[]]where 2 tiddlers may be tagged “test”. The tagged tiddlers will be alphabetically sorted by default. BUT there islist-before and list-afterand there is the taglistfield. … Not sure how raw may or may not work as expected, if used that way. - Also see the screenshot example, which isn’t intuitive
- eg using it like so:
- I did implement a new “suffix” … raw like so:
- I’ll need to write new unit tests for the existing function … because it seems there are none
- I’ll need to write new tests for the new function
- I’ll need to write the docs … if it’s clear how we can go on
- We need to test it with all browsers
But I’m not sure if it is a waste of time because of the following behaviour. It seems to be consistent with major browsers. But …
The “quirks” in the spec, produces “strange results”. See the screenshot. … So I’m not sure if we “should” implement it.
Do you think we can explain that behaviour, so users really understand it? … Be honest.
Initially I thought, the discussion would “dry out” after Jeremy’s comment.
But the brainstorming about a workaround did go on. … There have been some valid ideas and I think it can be solved with the wikitext functionality we have atm. … But the “work around” produces complex wikitext and filter code. … I’m not sure.
2 Likes
The rules are like that:
- every key that can be interpreted as an integer will be listed first
- and sorted in ascending order
- every string will be listed chronological
- sorted as created
- leading zeros in numbers are strings
1 Like
This works fine!
The keys have no value yet because I did not have the solution you provided.
The aim is to build a table with checkboxes which set the values.
Although it’s true that modern JS engines do now have well defined behaviour around the ordering of object keys, that doesn’t extend to JSON. The JSON spec very clearly states that object keys are unordered. That matters to us because our tiddler dictionary format is just a shortcut syntax for creating a JSON object, and we’d want to have consistent behaviour for all types of data tiddlers.
3 Likes
In the above solution I gave which is the equivalent of raw order, parsing the data in the correct order is easy.
Side note: Both data samples include non alphanumeric values in the keys relating to presentation. These should be removed and handled in the presentation of the final result.
- Eg a macro to display-no-breaks, replacing space with
However they next step I would have taken last night had I not being so tired would be to turn the resulting “key list” into a variable (containing a list) so it can be used in other operations. This may be my own weaknesses but I think it exposes fragility in tiddlywiki features because a little gymnastics needs to be done, possibly including wikification before one can get the result into a usable form.
Perhaps a more strategic solution would be to tackle the above issue and solve other issues at the same time, leaving this “unusual” raw order as an exception with a work around to make “key lists”.
I will have a look today at using one of the filter run prefixes such as MAP and the format title list to see if a better answer is already available.
- I feel we should be able to have a macro that returns the “raw list of keys”, end of story.
- Similarly other “lists of keys” with other orders could be generated in macros as well
- Then any wikitext can just make use of this key list as desired and use each as the index into the data.
1 Like
Small footnote on forcing a wanted output order from DD entries.
(This is probably a horrible kludge but worked for my minimal use case)
- prepend a wikitext
@@.style @@for DD items you need exactly ordered …
Test DD …
Results in what I want …
TT
@TiddlyTweeter this earlier solution worked on your data as well.
Here is an example against your data, which contains the “:” delimiter in the values so needed a modified approach. Without editing the keys as you did.
<$list filter="[{$:/tt/se/dic/en-word.dat}splitregexp[\n]]" variable=each-line>
<$set name=key filter="[<each-line>split[:]first[]]">
<$set name=href value={{{ [<each-line>removeprefix<key>removeprefix[:]] }}}>
<a href=<<href>> target="_blank" ><$text text=<<key>>/> </a><br>
</$set></$set>
</$list>
Thanks! I will try it!
My issue is integrating the macro that produces the listing (stolen already 
) with your solution.
I just lack the competence to integrate your solution with it.
I will look at it though.
Grazie, TT
I would be happy to have the filter syntax @pmario is working on -even if it only worked for data-dictionaries.
@TW_Tones workaround is already very helpfull.
@TiddlyTweeter I will also look at the display with non breaking spaces (not in the data) to fix that as well.
1 Like