I would like to highly recommend the Tiddlywiki section of DeepWiki.
This has proved extremely useful to me recently in getting a view of TW’s techincal layer underneath the scripting layer.
I still don’t fully comprehend TW but through this DeepWiki I am getting better.
bobj
Yes, it can give a good overview. What I like are the different versions of flow-charts, that are good quality.
For human written info have a look at: https://tiddlywiki.com/dev/ which also contains a HowTo create a TW widget … which may be interesting too
I have to admit that "DeepWiki“ could be useful. Not bad for a robot. A robot that is not too incontinent (meaning #1).
As a neo-Luddite I also find it very worrying.
How long before we can make A Ruston on the single press of a button and obliterate TW?
Just asking before the AI Apocalypse, TT
Thanks @TiddlyTitch this also looks like an interesting and informative resource
It is for human! Once you let LLM agent do the detailed jobs, let them read the source code will remove the necessality of deepwiki.
And I also recommend read TW’s source code directly, most of them are easy to read, and is equal to what you can do in the plugin’s code. Very deliberated design, core code usage also works as plugin code usage
@linonetwo I found insight into TiddlyWiki’s JS easy. Just point ChatGPT to tiddlywiki.com and ask it questions. One I did that gave an answer “too large to share” here, was to ask it what JS Functions are available for me to use in the console and JS bookmarklets. 95% Was helpful and useful.