Thanks to everyone for their enthusiasm for this idea.
An important point is that the best placed people to take up the editor role may not be the familiar faces who frequently engage in the discussions here.
The stats show that there are significant numbers of people who visit this forum nearly every day of the year, whilst making hardly any posts. In fact, the people posting here make up a rather small fraction of the total number of people who read the posts. That is all entirely to be expected: for a wide range of reasons, the majority of people don’t post, but instead get everything they need by reading the discussions involving others. (That is my experience personally with StackOverflow; I’ve consulted it countless times over the years, but I don’t think I’ve ever made a post there).
I think the ideal attributes for this role are:
- Constant monitoring of community hubs like talk.tiddlywiki.org, Twitter, Discord, Reddit etc
- Enough understanding of the TiddlyWiki ecosystem to know how to classify things correctly (eg does this new serverside implementation work via saving the whole wiki, or by syncing individual tiddlers?)
- Enough understanding of the perspective of others to be able to judge what is relevant for the broad community
- The writing skills to summarise effectively for a clearly defined audience
- An obsessive interest in optimising tagging (and other structures) to make the items more useful
That’s a lot to ask for! And so that’s why we may need a small team of people working together.
Ideally, we’d construct a news stream in a format that allows us to publish it in multiple ways:
- Daily/weekly/monthly email summaries
- An RSS feed
- The @TiddlyWiki accounts on Twitter and Mastodon
- A sidebar on tiddlywiki.com
Taken together, that means that the most useful thing for us would be for the news items to be gathered as tiddlers in one or more wikis that we can scrape into GitHub. So, if we had a single contributor then tiddlyhost would work. If we wanted a group to collaborate then we could set up a shared multiuser TiddlyWiki instance on https://xememex.com/
Each news item might be modelled as a text tiddler with tags, optional associated images and links. I think we’d probably want to use a fixed convention for titles like “YYYYMMDDhhmm”, keeping the human readable title in the “caption” field.